Everyday Virtualization

Blog archive

Fault-Tolerant Options Expand with everRun MX

One of the pillars of virtualization is the ability to abstract servers from hardware to provide additional availability. Of course, infrastructure demands continue to increase and we seek to deliver high availability or even fault tolerance beyond the basic virtual machine. A number of solutions are available for virtual workloads.

The fault-tolerant space has three mainstream players: the VMware Fault Tolerance virtual machine feature with vSphere, Neverfail (which has an OEM relationship for VMware's vCenter Server Heartbeat feature) and Marathon Technologies. Neverfail aligns with VMware, and Marathon aligns with Citrix.

Since the middle of the last decade, Marathon Technologies has offered solutions from HA to FT for Windows workloads before virtualized servers were mainstream in the datacenter. Back when I worked in the supply chain software industry, I used the everRun HA solution to replace fault-tolerant hardware solutions such as the NEC Express5800/ft or Stratus ftServer. Even back then, Marathon allowed customers to utilize commodity hardware for these HA and FT solutions.

Marathon recently released everRun MX, which provides a flexible offering to deliver FT workloads on commodity hardware. everRun MX can work for those who want to deploy a robust solution for a few workloads without a huge investment. everRun MX can use direct-attached storage or shared storage, making it price competitive if a traditional SAN is not involved. I've always thought it is very tough to provide a robust, highly available virtualized environment from small footprints such as a remote office.

With everRun MX, a base configuration starts at $10,000 and allows administrators to run a pair of servers of any configuration (core/sockets/memory) and includes one year of support and maintenance. The servers must have Intel processors. You can run everRun MX on dissimilar hardware, but they should be comparable. everRun MX uses the term Metal Pool, which would loosely equate to a cluster of virtual machines running with FT capabilities.

everRun MX

Figure 1. everRun MX allows a collection of virtual machines to function in a fault tolerant mode on commodity hardware. (Click image to view larger version.)

You might be asking: How well would this type of configuration be received within the greater software landscape? As virtualization customers, we go through this battle with new software titles to see if the software vendor supports their product being run on a virtual machine. For an architecture like this, it's not as widely embraced as is a VMware virtual machine as a supported platform. But Marathon does offer 24x7 worldwide support in addition to an extensive partner ecosystem. I haven't used Marathon products in a while, but everRun MX seems to bring more to the table for the customer seeking value and features.

Let me know if you want to see more of everRun MX and I'll follow up with an evaluation!

Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/07/2010 at 11:56 AM


Reader Comments:

Thu, Oct 14, 2010 Wondering IT Europe

What about performance of everRun? Demo on Marathon's site is with mail server. If this mail is receiving 100 emails per second for 1 hour, this everRun MX will be still able to update both servers and date will be synchronized or it will just slow down receiving of emails? Please advice!

Tue, Oct 12, 2010

I think you are comparing apples and oranges... Avance is an HA solution while my understanding here is everRun MX is an FT solution. Allowing me as the user to do the same thing you do with your ftServer line only I get to pick my hardware, and utlize 2 seperate servers to spread the risk, and save a few bucks in the process? Am I off base here?

Fri, Oct 8, 2010

Looks interesting. Does everRun MX provide load balancing between servers?

Fri, Oct 8, 2010 Kenneth Donoghue Stratus Technologies, Maynard Ma

Rick,We have literally dozens of customers and partners who would say the same about their experiences with alternative availability solutions.

Fri, Oct 8, 2010 Jim Hutto Denver - Mile Hi Church

Being a non-profit and small business, one of the problems we had with virtualization was being able to afford the backend cost of a SAN with fault tolerance. So, I checked out Marathon. I now have to HP Servers with XenServer and Everrun Software. And it works great. The Xenserver is the free license. The EverRun was expensive to us but no where near what I would have paid to get fault tolerance with a San.

Thu, Oct 7, 2010 Rick Vanover http://rickatron.us

Ken:

Thanks for your note. I didn't know that about Stratus, but I had such a bad taste in my mouth from my previous experience a number of years ago that I vowed never to touch Stratus again.

Thu, Oct 7, 2010 Ken Donoghue Stratus Technologies, Maynard, MA

The fault-tolerant space has three mainstream software players, emphasis on software. The Stratus ftServer today supports both VMware and Hyper V virtualization, with solutions for the SMB through enterprise. We too have an HA software solution called Avance that runs on standard servers and is XenServer-based. Marathon's products are and always have been Windows only. Not a bad thing, they just are. Stratus' are not. Service is typically an important consideration for customers with mission-critical applications, too. When something breaks -- HW, SW -- Stratus takes the call. How about these others?

Add Your Comment:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above