The Schwartz Cloud Report

Blog archive

IBM To Base Its Cloud on Open Standards with Focus on OpenStack

IBM is aligning all of its cloud infrastructure offerings around OpenStack, the open source effort initiated by Rackspace and NASA nearly three years ago.

While Big Blue was an earlier participant in the project and now a platinum sponsor of the OpenStack Foundation, it waited until last year to publicly acknowledge its involvement in the OpenStack initiative. On Monday, IBM threw all of its weight behind the project.

The company used its fourth annual Pulse conference, taking place this week in Las Vegas, to announce that all of its cloud services and software will be based on open standards, with OpenStack at the Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) layer, the Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) for Platform as a Service (PaaS) application portability, and HTML 5 for Software as a Service (SaaS).

Officials at IBM described Monday's announcement as a commitment to lead in the stewardship and support of cloud standards tantamount to its support for Linux over a decade ago, Apache and Java 2 Enterprise Edition at the Web application server layer, and Eclipse at providing standardized integrated development environment (IDE) tools.

"The need for open cloud services is a must," said Robert Leblanc, senior vice president for middleware at IBM, speaking at a press conference at Pulse. "It's not a nice-to-have. I think it has become a must. Clients cannot afford the time and energy it takes to write specific interfaces to all the various cloud environments that are out there today. This has become too important, too large for us not to help clients, and so basing on a set of open standards is key and that's why we are moving all of the SmartCloud Capabilities over to cloud standards. We are jumping in full force."

Jay Snyder, director of platform engineering at the insurance giant Aetna, was present at the briefing and said he will only use cloud-based solutions that are standards-based.

"I can't just stress enough the importance of open standards and that's really regardless of platform," Snyder said. "If you think about the cloud, the layers of the stack in the cloud, the hypervisor, operating system and orchestration, we expect those layers of the stack to evolve and change. If we don't have standards, we potentially run the risk of vendor lock-in and that's something we absolutely want to avoid. For us, having those standards in place ensures if -- for financial reasons or functional reasons -- we want to replace a component of the stack, we can do that. And that's critical to our success."

For example, Snyder said his organization wants to be able to select a hypervisor without it locking him into certain cloud management, orchestration and cloud operating systems. "We want to be able to flexibly replace those components as they evolve," he said. "Standards, we think, is a great way to protect freedom of choice and innovation, and that's why we're focused on standards."

The first key deliverable from IBM to come out of this effort is its new SmartCloud Orchestrator software that lets organizations build new cloud services using patterns or templates with a GUI-based "orchestrator" that enables cloud automation. It automates cloud-based app deployment and lifecycle management providing configuration of compute, storage and network resources. It also provides a self-service portal to manage and account for the cost of using cloud resources.

Posted by Jeffrey Schwartz on 03/04/2013 at 11:36 AM


What is this?

Reader Comments:

Mon, Mar 11, 2013 James USA

Aetna = Big IBM User. No wonder they are pimping up OpenStack. Second the word "Open" just means "what do we do if we are not Microsoft". Third, "Vendor Lock In", favorite buzzword for ages of the analyst community. Just tell me ... once a company invests in a software project, and develops for that platfrom, do they ever move it to some other platfrom expecting it to run unmodified? Even Java still has not met its original promise. and Forth, anything in IT involving a "Movement" or a "Foundation", as if they are some moral high ground is just named that way in order to hook the still naive IT Architects and managers out there who this all this is for the greater good. I say, you do whats best for your company, minimize the risks, and although all the "Open" stuff feels so warm and fuzzy, all it is for vendors is another way to keep you "Locked In" to standards that take years to evolve, only to find out that the world of innovation has moved on, and nobody cares anymore. Just do whats best for whomever pays you, and you will be alright.

Thu, Mar 7, 2013 Cloud Sailer Under Way, Computing in the Cloud

Nice to see IBM get on board (finally) here. The likes of Rackspace and HP are "all in" of course, and been driving this for some time. Witness HP Cloud Services built entirely on OpenStack, and their CloudSystem adopting key technologies and embedding already.

Wed, Mar 6, 2013 Tim Wessels Somewhere in the cloud

Well, it is good to know that IBM is going "all-in" on OpenStack and that all of its cloud services and software will be based on open standards. IBM has come a long way since the era of Systems Network Architecture (SNA). Consultants used to make a living figuring out what SNA was all about, but in the end SNA was whatever IBM said it was. So this is good news but not that surprising given that IBM has supported the use of Linux distros like SUSE on their mainframe systems for a long time. And when you get into the history of virtualiation, IBM was doing that back in the day by running multiple instances of MVS on the VM/370 operating system. IBM could become a major force for good in the OpenStack community.

Add Your Comment:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above