When vSphere was first released, the new features and their alignment to existing investments created lots of confusion. Customers that have an active Support and Subscription (SnS) agreement were entitled to a certain level of vSphere features. There were no direct mappings to the Enterprise Plus level of vSphere that did not involve the promotional pricing to upgrade all processors to Enterprise Plus, however.
At the time, the Enterprise level of vSphere licensing was slated to be available for sale for a limited time. To this day, Enterprise is still available for sale. For anyone considering between the two versions, I will definitely nudge you towards Enterprise Plus. Here are a few reasons why:
- vSMP support: Enterprise currently limits a virtual machine to 4 vCPU, effectively still functioning at the same level as ESXi 3.x. vSphere is capable of 8 vSMP to a single virtual machine, but it isn't licensed to that level unless Enterprise Plus is utilized.
- Cores per processor: Enterprise limits this to six cores per socket. While the current mainstream processors are available with six cores and will easily fit most installations, consider the future and any licensing that will be reapplied to new servers.
- Distributed switch functionality: This is somewhat forward-looking, but if at any point vCloud Director would be a consideration in the future; this is made much easier with the heavy networking investment.
- Host profiles: This vSphere feature allows customized host configurations for almost any manageable value to be applied centrally to vCenter after a host ESXi system is installed.
The full breakdown of Standard, Advanced, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus licensing levels is here.
The other side of the coin is, if all of these levels bring too much cost into the picture and the features are not required, VMware has made a serious leap forward with the revised Essentials Plus offering. Basically, small and remote sites that need a virtualized infrastructure will see it as a winning solution; but not all of the features of the big datacenters. Check out the Essentials Plus offering here.
Enterprise Plus may not be needed for all installations, but if the decision rests between Enterprise and Enterprise Plus; it should be pretty clear which way to go.
Have you made the case to stay on Enterprise? If so, share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/21/2010 at 12:48 PM5 comments
During VMworld in San Francisco, an important update crept out for the VMware vCenter Converter Standalone
edition. It was great news for me, as I had started to wonder if the product was going the way of a deprecated product. The virtual machine conversion mechanism is still an important part of the arsenal for today's virtualization administrator. I frequently use it for additional physical-to-virtual conversions, specialized virtual-to-virtual operations such as a data center migration and to shrink existing virtual machines.
Version 4.3 was released on August 30 with two key features. The first is support for Windows 7 x86 and x64 editions; the other is support for Windows Server 2008 x86, x64 and R2 editions. This support is both for a machine to be converted as well as the platform to run VMware Converter. After installing VMware Converter 4.3, the supported operating system table only goes as old as Windows XP for Windows systems. This means that Windows 2000 has fallen off of the supported platform list for Converter 4.3. It may be a good idea to grab one of the older copies of VMware Converter while you can, in case you still support Windows 2000.
VMware Converter 4.3 adds a number of other natural platform support configurations, including support for vSphere 4.1. But perhaps the most intriguing support with this release is a broad offering of Hyper-V support. Windows virtual machines that are powered on while running on Hyper-V may be converted as well as powered-off virtual machines that run Windows Server 2008 including x86, x64 and R2 editions, Windows 7, Windows Vista, XP, SUSE Linux 10 and 11, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. Microsoft .VHD and .VMC virtual disk formats can also be imported.
I've used it a few times since it was released and have not had any issues with it performing virtual-to-virtual conversion tasks. VMware Converter is still a critical part of the daily administrator's toolkit and finally made complete with Windows 7 and Server 2008 support.
Have you had any issues with the new version thus far? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/19/2010 at 12:48 PM5 comments
One of the things I love about virtualization is that the virtualization community aspect is so well defined. I particularly enjoy also that the VMworld events are a manifestation of the community, and that was repeated this week in Copenhagen for the VMworld Europe show. In years past, VMworld Europe has been at a polar opposite on the calendar from the VMworld event in the U.S.; which finished up in early September in San Francisco.
By having the events so close together, VMware and the partners can control timing of news as well as releases. It is an incredible feat to pull off an event the size of VMworld, much less having to repeat the ordeal a mere six weeks later in Europe. By having the same message, announcements, labs and other components that make up VMworld; there is an incredible logistic efficiency obtained.
After VMworld in San Francisco, I had a discussion about the logistics of one, two or even three events recently on the Virtumania podcast. A suggestion was raised to have more events, and I quickly chirped in saying that it is way too much work to put on an additional event of this level. This leads to my biggest complaint about VMworld, the fact that the US events are always in the Western part of the country. There are plenty of destinations in the central part of the US, but the most compelling reason is for the attendees. Given that there is not a VMworld for the Asia/Pacific region, a VMworld event needs to be accessible for those attendees. The Western cities of San Francisco, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and others do that nicely.
For my own VMworld attendance strategy, next year I am going to try to attend both events. This will allow me to fully take in everything that you miss between the two events. Believe me, there is plenty to take in. If you are borderline on attending VMworld and have never done so before, I recommend you do it. There is something for everyone at the event, and as a blogger I find this as an important way to meet up with other bloggers, tech companies and the readers.
Until next year, the craze that is VMworld will get quiet. As for the whole cloud thing, well, we'll work on that.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/14/2010 at 12:48 PM2 comments
What's great about virtualization is the fact that we can change just about anything we want with minimal impact to production workloads. It's partly due to functionality from hypervisors and management software, but the human factor plays a big part. Here is a quick housecleaning checklist to review through a vSphere environment (and applies to versions of vSphere and VI3), to catch the small things that may have accumulated over the years:
Datastore contents: How many times have you put a powered-off virtual machine in a special folder, on a special datastore or held onto just a .VMDK in case you ever needed it? There are a number of crafty ways to find these, including using a product like the VKernel Optimization Pack to find unused virtual machines. Also keep your eyes open for the “Non-VI workload” error message from last week's blog post.
Reformat VMFS: I know there is no hard reason to upgrade, but it is annoying to see a smattering of volumes that are created as storage is added and ESXi (or ESX) versions are incremented. Evacuating each volume with Storage vMotion and reformatting will bring every volume up to VMFS 3.46 (assuming version vSphere 4.1 is in use). This would also be a good time to reformat each volume at the 8 MB page size, as there is no real compelling reason to be on 4, 2 or 1 MB sizes.
Check for antiquated DRS configuration items: Rules that are not needed any more, resource reservations that were a temporary fix, or limits that may not need to be in place can put extra strain on the DRS algorithm.
Reconfigure drive arrays: If you have been wishing to reformat a drive array at a different RAID level (such as RAID 6 instead of RAID 5), the previous datastore step may create a good time to correct this.
Reconcile all virtual machines with lifecycle and approval: We've never stood up a test virtual machine as an experiment, have we? Make sure all experimental machines are removed or that they still need to exist.
Permission and role reconciliation: Check that the current roles, active administrators, permissions and group setup are as expected.
Template and .ISO file cleanup: Do we really still need all of the Windows 2000 and XP virtual machine templates? Chances are at least one template can be removed.
Update templates: For Windows updates, VMware Tools, virtual machine version, etc.; these configuration elements can quickly get obsolete.
Change root password: Probably a good idea if you've had staff turnover at some point.
Do you have any additional housekeeping items? Share your periodic tasks here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/12/2010 at 12:48 PM5 comments
One of the pillars of virtualization is the ability to abstract servers from hardware to provide additional availability. Of course, infrastructure demands continue to increase and we seek to deliver high availability or even fault tolerance beyond the basic virtual machine. A number of solutions are available for virtual workloads.
The fault-tolerant space has three mainstream players: the VMware Fault Tolerance virtual machine feature with vSphere, Neverfail (which has an OEM relationship for VMware's vCenter Server Heartbeat feature) and Marathon Technologies. Neverfail aligns with VMware, and Marathon aligns with Citrix.
Since the middle of the last decade, Marathon Technologies has offered solutions from HA to FT for Windows workloads before virtualized servers were mainstream in the datacenter. Back when I worked in the supply chain software industry, I used the everRun HA solution to replace fault-tolerant hardware solutions such as the NEC Express5800/ft or Stratus ftServer. Even back then, Marathon allowed customers to utilize commodity hardware for these HA and FT solutions.
Marathon recently released everRun MX, which provides a flexible offering to deliver FT workloads on commodity hardware. everRun MX can work for those who want to deploy a robust solution for a few workloads without a huge investment. everRun MX can use direct-attached storage or shared storage, making it price competitive if a traditional SAN is not involved. I've always thought it is very tough to provide a robust, highly available virtualized environment from small footprints such as a remote office.
With everRun MX, a base configuration starts at $10,000 and allows administrators to run a pair of servers of any configuration (core/sockets/memory) and includes one year of support and maintenance. The servers must have Intel processors. You can run everRun MX on dissimilar hardware, but they should be comparable. everRun MX uses the term Metal Pool, which would loosely equate to a cluster of virtual machines running with FT capabilities.
Figure 1. everRun MX allows a collection of virtual machines to function in a fault tolerant mode on commodity hardware. (Click image to view larger version.)
You might be asking: How well would this type of configuration be received within the greater software landscape? As virtualization customers, we go through this battle with new software titles to see if the software vendor supports their product being run on a virtual machine. For an architecture like this, it's not as widely embraced as is a VMware virtual machine as a supported platform. But Marathon does offer 24x7 worldwide support in addition to an extensive partner ecosystem. I haven't used Marathon products in a while, but everRun MX seems to bring more to the table for the customer seeking value and features.
Let me know if you want to see more of everRun MX and I'll follow up with an evaluation!
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/07/2010 at 12:48 PM7 comments
In VMware Infrastructure 3, the one area that the vCenter Server needed to do a better job was its built-in alarms and alerting. So, one vSphere 4 objective was to increase the breadth of built-in alarms. This saves administrators time with PowerShell, as the only way to achieve full safety is to script alerts and send e-mails.
The good side is that you can put in a lot of handling and specific criteria for the thresholds -- well, at least as good as you can script them. The bad side is that the vCenter Server database doesn't track these events to the affected object (datastore, host, VM, etc.).
vSphere 4 has a new alert, "Non-VI workload detected on the datastore" that is somewhat misleading. This message shows up on an otherwise healthy datastore (see Fig. 1).
The basic premise for this alert on the datastore is to avoid a virtual machine that is removed from inventory consuming too much space on the datastore. This is somewhat of a misnomer, as many administrators put non-workload data on datastores. This data can include CD-ROM .ISO files as well as a special backup of a system before it is deleted.
Further, the VMFS file system has built-in functionality to allow multiple ESXi hosts connect. This means that you can have a number of ESXi hosts that may be licensed with vCenter connect to a datastore, and that same datastore is zoned on the storage system to another ESXi system, such as the free edition without vCenter (I cover this in my "Forward Motion" post from last year).
The new alert is also somewhat useless as it doesn't tell you what the offending workload is on the datastore. Administrators are left to use the Storage View functionality and maps to determine what files or virtual machines are the culprits. I'm all for saving datastore space, but I don't like that this defaults to an "Alert" level and issues a red indicator. This can be changed to a "Warning" level and issue a yellow indicator in the definition of the alarm (see Fig. 2).
Figure 1. While the datastore has ample space and adequate connectivity, an alarm is generated by the presence of foreign content. (Click image to view larger version.)
Figure 2. You can make this condition issue a warning instead of an alert in the definition of the alarm. (Click image to view larger version.)
Do you find this alert a little confusing or over-cautious? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 10/05/2010 at 12:48 PM1 comments
For a good part of this year, I have been part of a tremendous opportunity to see a virtualized storage platform come to existence. This week, Hitachi Data Systems released the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform
. The VSP platform is an enterprise storage platform of extreme scale, with a maximum configuration offering 255 PB in six racks.
Virtualized storage is a great way to extend the virtualization initiatives that have made many heroes in datacenters around the world. As the VSP product was launched, there was a clear priority to reflect the infrastructure trends of today's datacenters. The VSP was designed to integrate with virtualization technologies such as VMware vSphere and Hyper-V.
VSP does not support VMware's vSphere API's for Array Integration at the release, but an incremental software update is scheduled for later this year. This isn't exactly a surprise as many of the storage products that are in the VAAI program are in the “announced support” stage versus “available now.” A few products had VAAI support for storage products ready at the vSphere 4.1 release including the modular storage offering from HDS, the AMS 2000 line. A handful of other storage products were ready from the start, with a few more making announcements for support by the end of the year having participated in the VAAI program with VMware (see my post on VAAI). A vCenter Plug-In for the VSP will be released soon.
In the course of seeing the VSP become a product, I had an opportunity to meet with engineers and product managers to understand the priorities for creating a new virtualized storage system.
The VSP took a new approach to a number of items related to virtualization, architecture and software. Aside from the upcoming VAAI support, the VSP focused on creating a series of virtualized components through the system. Enterprise storage systems such as the VSP and its competition have a number of components and interconnections that are critical architectural factors in the scale and performance of the system. For example, the VSP utilizes commodity processors (Intel quad core) on the storage directors (back end and front end) which are a big improvement over the preceding ASIC architecture. VSP can also provide automated storage tiering at the entire volume or sub-volume level with Hitachi Dynamic Tiering. This can be incredibly beneficial if a virtual machine creates a hot spot on disk and needs to be prioritized to another tier of disk when vSphere's Storage I/O control can't meet the needs of the virtual machine.
What I learned is that virtualized storage is going to only become more important in any large virtualization strategy. I'm quite excited to see what will be coming in the next iteration of VAAI features and how the virtualized storage landscape changes with new products for the current needs of the virtualized datacenter.
Note: I attended blogger events sponsored by HDS, which are governed by my official blogger disclosure.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/30/2010 at 12:47 PM1 comments
I'm still digesting the material I got at VMworld 2010 . The show had two over-arching themes: cloud and VDI. It's not entirely surprising, as these are new segments for VMware and the larger virtualization market. While those are good things to focus on, I and others still need to focus on the virtual machines we have in use.
Virtual machine memory management is still one of the most tactical areas of virtualization administration. Something I'm watching closely is how new operating systems will impact my daily practice. My practice mainly revolves around Windows-based virtual machines, and Windows Server 2008 R2 is the server operating system of choice. Too many times applications give a generic list of requirements, and infrastructure administrators are left making decisions that may impact the overall success of the installation. One strategy is to identify what the memory would look like on a new virtual machine in terms of slices that represent each requirement. Fig. 1 shows a sample virtual machine with two core applications.
Figure 1. Having a visual representation of the memory requirements is a good way to plan what the virtual machine memory may look like. (Click image to view larger version.)
It's an incredible challenge for a virtualization administrator to provision exactly what memory is required, yet balance headroom within the guest for unique workloads. We also have to be aware of the host environment. It very well may be that in a year the application's requirements may double, thus the performance and resource requirements may double as well. Fortunately, server virtualization allows ease of scale in most areas (CPU, disk, network) but memory can be more tricky to implement. Memory is relatively inexpensive now, but that may not be the case forever and we may end up flirting with host maximums for older Hyper-V or VMware vSphere hosts.
The takeaway is to give consideration to each operating system's limits. This will impact what headroom would be available for a guest virtual machine as well as the aggregated impact on the host. A few years ago, administrators dodged a bullet with Windows Server 2003 Standard (x86) having a 4 GB limit for a virtual machine. For Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard edition, the limit is now 32 GB. It is possible that applications that are replacing older servers running Windows Server 2003 to now require double, triple or more RAM than the previous systems. Luckily, a number of virtualization tools (many of them free) can aid the virtualization administrator in this planning process. This MSDN resource has memory configuration maximums for all versions of Windows.
Virtualization administrators should pay special attention to the limits, requirements and aggregate memory capacity with insight to future needs. For this aspect of workload planning, what tools (free or not) do you utilize to assist in this process? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/28/2010 at 12:48 PM7 comments
One benefit of vCenter is the plug-in framework, which allows a rich ecosystem of partner software to be installed in the vSphere Client and work with vSphere. While most installations will automatically install a vSphere plug-in, you may be pondering on how to remove them. This is important as many software programs are used on an evaluation basis or any carryover plug-ins from a vCenter 2.5 to 4.0 upgrade. It's easy to find a stale plug-in by viewing the Plug-In Manager .
Figure 1. vCenter Plug-In Manager shows installed plug-ins (Click image to view larger version.)
To remove plug-ins on the vCenter Server, go into the vCenter Managed Object Reference at http://vcenterservername/mob (if you're accessing it remotely, use https). Authenticate with vSphere credentials and then click on content and then the extension manager
Figure 2. To remove plug-ins, go to the MOB and then the Extension Manager (Click image to view larger version.)
From the list of installed extensions, get the text of the plug-in that you want to remove , but don't take the extensionList[" part of the name, nor the "] at the end. Click the "UnregisterExtension" link at the bottom of the page and enter the plug-in name.
Figure 3. Unregistering the plug-in (Click image to view larger version.)
Click the Invoke Method option to remove the plug-in. The message in the browser may be a little less than intuitive, but at that point the plug-in is removed from the MOB. Subsequent vSphere Client connections won't load it during the discovery stage of their load. Should you be using vCenter Linked Mode, remove it from all vCenter Server systems as well. This easy step can help keep your vCenter server environment clean of unwanted plug-ins as well as keep vSphere Client connections cleaner.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/24/2010 at 12:47 PM6 comments
In my post, "Religious Issue #6: Thin Provisioning
," a number of people piped up with comments, as I expected. I'm a fan of thin provisioning and use it in almost every situation for my virtualization practice. But, there is one side of thin provisioning that is more of an art than a science: managing oversubscription.
The basic premise of oversubscription is that by the space savings of thin provisioning, the provisioned amount can exceed the threshold of raw capacity. In my personal lab, I have oversubscribed the primary VMFS datastore by over 18 TB (see Fig. 1). This isn't what I would do in the real world, but nonetheless it is tracked by vSphere.
Oversubscription is not necessarily a bad thing; in fact, SAN admins have been doing this for some time. For the typical Windows administrator who has graduated to virtualization administrator, managing oversubscription may be a new skill.
I'd like to point out one caveat to thin provisioning: performance. Thin provisioning by itself has minimal impact on a virtual machine's performance. In Tuesday's post, Scott Drummonds posts a few of his thoughts and a link to VMware thin provisioning white paper. (Thanks, Scott!) In that resource, Figure 4 shows that thin provision has effectively no impact on performance.
Figure 1. The VMFS volume has allocated virtual machines much more storage than is available. (Click image to view larger version.)
My observation on thin provisioning is that the same datastore may have been heavily consumed by free space of a virtual machine, is now populated with the real usage of a virtual machine. We are now able to achieve a greater datastore density, and based on the workloads on that type of disk, we may observe performance differences simply by consolidating more.
Managing oversubscription is best served by the built-in vSphere alerts. How do you hedge off oversubscription, and is the 15-percent threshold (default value) adequate for your needs? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/23/2010 at 9:03 AM2 comments
Within virtualization circles, there is debate about whether or not to use thin provisioning on the hypervisor. Thin provisioning is available on all major hypervisors, including VMware's vSphere 4. For vSphere, thin provisioning of a virtual machine disk file (VMDK) incrementally grows the disk as the guest operating system increases its storage requirement.
Thin provisioning with vSphere has a number of caveats. First, there is no incremental shrink. This means if that the guest operating system incurs a growth of 1 GB, and then that space is removed from the guest; the 1 GB is still consumed within the VMDK. The solution is a Storage vMotion activity which will resize the destination VMDK to the actual consumption on disk. Storage consumption usually only goes up; so this behavior isn't exactly too much of an inconvenience in the everyday administrator's storage management practice.
The good news is that if the guest virtual machine consumes an additional 1 GB of storage in the above example and then is removed and subsequently replaced by another 1 GB of growth on the guest operating system's file system, the net growth is only 1 GB. Guest virtual machine behavior may dictate otherwise, but this is a generalization. You can check the used vs. provisioned storage amounts for a vSphere virtual machine in the summary section of the vSphere Client (see Fig. 1).
Figure 1. The provisioned amount compared to consumed amount for a thin provisioned disk on a virtual machine will show the usage at that moment. (Click image to view larger version.)
The potential downside to a thin provisioned VMDK is the behavior associated with the guest virtual machine and the frequency of metadata updates. On a VMFS volume, a metadata update is a coordinated transaction across all hosts and paths connected to the datastore. This is probably the one downside of the VMFS architecture as there is not software coordinator node or management layer as other clustered file systems have in place. When the VMDK file grows in its thin provisioned state, a metadata update occurs for each growth operation. Aside from growing a virtual machine, the following activities constitute metadata updates, according to VMware KB 1005009:
- Creating a VMFS datastore
- Expanding a VMFS datastore onto additional extents
- Powering on a virtual machine
- Acquiring a lock on a file
- Creating or deleting a file
- Creating a template
- Deploying a virtual machine from a template
- Creating a new virtual machine
- Migrating a virtual machine with VMotion
- Growing a file, for example, a Snapshot file or a thin provisioned Virtual Disk
Generally speaking, metadata updates are something that you want to avoid and are probably the biggest ding against thin provisioned VMDKs. If you have good insight into the application's growth behavior, you may not want to thin provision those frequently growing virtual machines. Of course, you could rely on the storage system to do the thin provisioning and avoid the metadata updates.
How do you approach thin provisioning for vSphere virtual machines? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/21/2010 at 12:48 PM7 comments
While VMware users a slew of new features in vSphere 4.1, I still mourn the loss of the vSphere Host Update Utility. This nice Windows-based tool made it very easy to upgrade an ESXi host from one version to the next, as we did when we went from ESXi 3.5 to 4.0. It also made updating ESXi hosts with hotfixes a breeze as well.
With vSphere 4.1, the free installation of ESXi now dubbed vSphere Hypervisor does not have the Host Update Utility (see Fig. 1). It was part of the vSphere Client Install package as an option that would allow administrators to apply ESXi updates to the host as well as deploy an upgrade .ZIP file.
I have not received official confirmation why the tool wasn't included, but my suspicion is that it is to drive customers to purchase some form of vCenter Server and use Update Manager to keep the hosts up to date. Another reason might be that ESXi's command-line interface is no longer labeled "unsupported." Within the command-line interface, administrators can now use the esxupdate or vihostupdate utilities, but tThese are far less intuitive than the smooth operations of the Host Update Utility. For the free ESXi installations, it isn't exactly "supported" but at least it is not "unsupported." I expect it to be confusing, yet I guess this twisted mind of mine can make sense of this change of heart by VMware.
Figure 1. The Host Update Utility is nifty, but it's not in the new vSphere update. (Click image to view larger version.)
At VMworld 2010 I attended a session on ESXi. I asked the presenter, a VMware employee, what the technical reason was for removing the tool. I didn't get a clear answer, but he asked us if we would like to see it back. Of course I would, but I won't hold my breath. This is yet another setback in a series of cuts or dead-ends to free products from VMware, and I don't expect the trend to stop soon.
Do you miss the Host Update Utility? Share your comments here.
Posted by Rick Vanover on 09/16/2010 at 12:47 PM9 comments