The Schwartz Cloud Report

Blog archive

Does Cloud Computing Reduce IT Costs?

The reason there's so much hype around cloud computing is the promise that it will reduce infrastructure costs while providing compute and storage capacity on demand. But, of course, moving to cloud computing doesn't necessarily guarantee cost savings.

In the latest reminder of that dichotomy, a survey of 1,300 businesses in the United States and United Kingdom released last week by Rackspace showed that 66 percent found cloud computing has reduced their IT costs, while 17 percent said it failed to do so. The remainder had no opinion. Yet another survey commissioned by Internap, which runs 12 datacenters throughout the United States, primarily for colocation but also for its cloud computing business, suggests that of the 65 percent who said they are considering the use of cloud services, 41 percent expect them to reduce their costs.

This obviously isn't an apples-to-apples comparison since, among other variations, the Rackspace study surveyed those who already use cloud services while the Internap survey didn't query only those running apps in the cloud. But the two surveys offer some interesting data points on the role costs play in determining the value of using cloud computing services.

"It used to be debatable whether the cloud was saving money or not, but apparently the businesses we surveyed believe it is saving them money," said Rackspace CTO John Engates in an interview last week.

But depending on your application, cloud computing can actually cost more, warned Raj Dutt, senior VP of technology at Internap. That's especially the case for applications that have consistent and predictable compute and storage usage, he explained.

"People move to the cloud for perceived cost savings and what we're finding is it gets really expensive compared to colocation, [particularly] if you look at the three-year overall total cost of ownership of an application that is pretty constant," Dutt said.

The cynic in me says, "Of course, Rackspace is going to share data that finds cloud computing reduces IT costs, and why wouldn't a colocation provider want to deliver numbers that show the benefits of running your own gear in offsite facilities, even if it has a cloud business as well?" But what these two surveys have in common is they both put forth a healthy long-term prognosis for cloud computing. Indeed, Engates pointed out that Rackspace uses the colocation facilities of Equinix.

While nearly two-thirds of those surveyed by Internap are considering cloud services, the company didn't ask if they were already using them. Nonetheless, 57 percent said they were considering hybrid IT infrastructure services, which Dutt said bodes well for the future use of colocation facilities since customers would likely cloud-enable or extend the apps already running in those facilities to Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers.

"What Internap is interested in doing is bringing a lot of the cloud capabilities like remote insight management, APIs, even the ability to control your infrastructure programmatically remotely without having to call the datacenter or send someone to fix your problem in your rack," Dutt said. "We're able to provide the service delivery promise that the cloud offers into the 'colo' world where no one is expecting it, and we're able to do it under a single pane of glass [from a] single vendor and allow you to build your app on the building block that best makes sense for you."

From the Rackspace survey, of those already using cloud computing:

  • The largest sample, 41 percent, said cloud computing reduced costs from 10 to 25 percent, while 19 percent said it providing 25 to 50 percent in IT savings, and 27 percent said it only cut costs by 10 percent or less.
  • 54 percent said use of cloud services helped accelerate IT project implementation, including application development, while 17 percent begged to differ. The rest weren't sure.
  • 56 percent saw increased profits while 18 percent reported no benefit to the bottom line, with 26 percent unsure.
  • 49 percent said cloud computing helped grow their businesses, with 21 percent seeing no such benefit, and 30 percent unsure.
  • 59 percent said cloud services provided better disaster recovery.
  • 56 percent were using open source cloud technology, though in the United States that figure is 70 percent.

If you're using cloud services, is it saving you money? And if so, what are you doing with those savings? And where do colocation facilities fit in your future IT and cloud plans? Share your findings below or drop me a line at jschwartz@1105media.com.

Posted by Jeffrey Schwartz on 02/26/2013 at 4:16 PM


What is this?

Reader Comments:

Thu, Feb 28, 2013 Prashant Gattani USA

I migrated many customers from traditional infrastructure to cloud. Their total cost savings resulted more than 30%. I did not enhance their applications while deploying on cloud but consolidated infrastructure in cloud to utilize 100% compute capacity. Address storage needs to save the cost. Reduce IT resources to manage infrastructure. Well, there are lot of opportunities exists when you think about cloud, but you need to do proper assessment before you plan your move to cloud.

Wed, Feb 27, 2013 Hassan Hosseini United Kingdom

It completely depends on the application and the use case. The cloud isn't for all applications and enterprises need to do some upfront investigation before they go ahead with a strategy. I guess we see this a lot due to what we offer (we run a free cloud cost forecasting simulation engine called PlanForCloud - from RightScale). Great read. Cheers, Hassan

Wed, Feb 27, 2013 Vik sagerty

I agree with raj dutt. Cloud is definitely a lot more expensive for a static workload despite what amazon or rack space may have you believe

Add Your Comment:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above