Rethinking Storage With Microsoft's Resilient File System
        If you want to move to Hyper-V 2016, you must check this out. 
        
        
			- By Rick Vanover
- 08/24/2016
Over  the years, we've seen a number of improvements from Microsoft in the area of  new storage technologies. They include SMB 3.0, Shared VHDX, ODX, Storage Spaces Direct, Deduplication and now Resilient File System (ReFS). 
  ReFS  in particular has been moving very fast in terms of innovation. Paul Ferrill  has covered the v2 release of ReFS then in the technical preview stage of Windows  Server 2016; now the third version of ReFS is in the latest technical preview.
  After  looking it over, I've become convinced that ReFS 3.0 should be your storage  technology if you'll be using Hyper-V 2016. That's because ReFS 3.0 is an  intelligent file system, and it's going to help Hyper-V environments in scores  of ways. Everything from VM provisioning, to backup, to migration and deletion  can benefit from ReFS on the Windows Server 2016 platform. 
  In  fact, I'd go so far as to say that you'd really be doing Hyper-V 2016 wrong if you stayed with NTFS. This is obvious  in the "single server with direct-attached storage" environment; but  environments using shared storage also need to see the light of ReFS as well.  This approach, Storage Spaces Direct, will also leverage ReFS as a Clustered Shared  Volume resource.
  While  selecting the right or best storage arrangement is up for debate, and should be  based on your organization's requirements, I think it's imperative that Hyper-V  2016 testing also include the latest storage technologies leveraging ReFS. 
  Part  of that means considering that it may be time to re-think your Hyper-V storage  strategy. I've seen, a number of times, the situation occur where an upgrade  doesn't change bad decisions from the past, or fix issues with the virtual  infrastructure "plumbing." I've seen this in Hyper-V as well as with other  virtualization platforms. 
  My top tip here is to consider your upgrade to Hyper-V 2016 an opportunity to  migrate to a new cluster, built completely correct. The new cluster would have  the storage, networking and clustering configuration correct for the platform.  Replication is a good way to migrate completely to a new cluster, yet the old  environment is there in case things don't go as planned. 
  The  final task is to ensure the VM is updated with the Update-VMVersion cmdlet. This will ensure that the VMs are able to use the  newest features of Hyper-V 2016.
Have you given a look at ReFS and the new  storage technologies of Windows? If not, I think you should. What are your  plans for Hyper-V 2016? Share your comments below.
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
        
        
                
                    About the Author
                    
                
                    
                    Rick Vanover (Cisco Champion, Microsoft MVP, VMware vExpert) is based in Columbus, Ohio. Vanover's experience includes systems administration and IT management, with virtualization, cloud and storage technologies being the central theme of his career recently. Follow him on Twitter @RickVanover.